🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.